Sugden’s posterous

 
« Back to blog

Is Twitter innovative?

THIS IS A COPY OF MY POST AT http://eduvel.wordpress.com  (http://eduvel.wordpress.com/2009/06/05/is-twitter-innovative/).
I don't intend to make a habit of posting in two places - but am doing it this time to re-publicise my new MAIN BLOG at http://eduvel.wordpress.com
___________________________________________

On Sunday last, I was invited to follow #spymaster (http://playspymaster.com/) on Twitter. Given that my invite came from a respected friend, and the fact that that friend is one who pushes the boundaries of learning technology (and the further - final fact that it was Sunday and not really a work day - although ....) I succumbed. You never know unless you try!

The game - and this does not really matter for the purposes of my post - puts you in the position of a James Bond, Ilya Kuryakin sort of spy. You have to earn money by doing simple tasks, buy 'stuff' to make you more powerful and assassinate people. That's about it. I saw pretty early on that it was something that, if you became committed to it, would suck the time out of your life. It is/was like everything I hate about Face Book - pointless and silly. However, for the occasional 10 minutes I played with it on the day it was a harmless pastime. The main problem with it, is the viral nature of its invitation policy - unless you're careful everyone you've ever written to or heard from on your email programme will be invited. The designers have clearly set out to rule the world.

Nevertheless, my agreeing to use the game was my choice.

It was a surprise therefore to read several Twitter posts which implied that the game was 'not an innovative use of Twitter'. Because I thought it was. Had it been the sort of thing I actually liked, or if I could have found an educational use for the game - it might have been an innovative use of Twitter. Because Twitter itself no longer innovates. Twitter for many, is just another bandwagon and it's shine will fade (see James Clay's excellent:Ten reasons why Twitter will eventually wither and die… - he cites this game as an example of #9 ). Others have posted that they will un-follow(!!) Twitterers that post to #followfriday. Another form of creeping death.

So what is innovation? Is it anything that doesn't have a bandwagon following it? Surely innovation is the taking of 'something' and putting it to another - useful - use? Perhaps that's the real question - what do we as individuals deem to be useful?

Needless to say, I've now done what I can to disable my #spymaster account. I didn't like it, I couldn't see how it could be adapted for educational purposes and I can't be bothered with it - but as I said before: you never know unless you try!

Also read: Ten things people say about using Twitter, but really they shouldn’t (James Clay).

Cheers

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments (5)

Jun 05, 2009
Ben Sugden said...
Even worse is the way that Twits (Twitter Users) who link twitter to their facebook status feed (the part of facebook that is most like twitter) end up spamming all their non-twit friends/acquaintances/contacts with #spymaster messages.

One friend of mine must have spammed ten updates in as many minutes the other day.

One mistake many people seem to make about twitter is the assumption that twitter actually innovated in the first place, in my opinion it has always been a bandwagon, with no real use other than message streaming to a group of contacts.

Facebook is just the same, albeit with a bit more functionality thrown in. It twits through its status feed and it propagates through viral infection of those around you. Whilst twitter is entering what you might see as the final death throes, facebook has begun to corrupt even further with the appearance of spam applications and groups who's sole purpose is to hook users into myoffers style adverts and pyramid schemes.

Social networking is like a pro-biotic turned bad. It only ever had use for those who chose to believe in its utility who are now beginning to suffer a bad case of web-diarrhea.

Jun 05, 2009
Sugden David said...
I hate FaceBook with a passion you could only dream of.
Also see:
http://dsugden.posterous.com/micro-blogging-0
http://dsugden.posterous.com/revolting-students-twittering
http://dsugden.posterous.com/friendfeed-43
For my various defences of micro-blogging from an educational point of view.

I like the comment: Social networking is like a pro-biotic turned bad

Jun 05, 2009
Ben Sugden said...
I am happy with facebook insofar as I can manage a large number of contacts (predominantly related to the LRP I take part in).

I have no doubt that there are other tools out there that would work as well but facebook's popularity means that I catch much more of my "social network" there than anywhere else. That being said, facebook use is likely to wane over time as alternatives come into favour.

Jun 07, 2009
Brett McGuire said...
Surely if you subscribe to a friend's Facebook page it is not spam...? Interesting read, David.
Jun 08, 2009
Ben Sugden said...
If you had asked me that a year ago I would have disagreed. In the early days of facebook I was naive enough to see it purely as a means to keep in touch* with the many acquaintances I have made through work and hobbies.

Of course facebook has changed over time, bloating with infectious applications and trivial memes. Where once I would see photographs of mutual friends and pass the odd salutation with others; now I see invitation after invitation to quizzes, games and groups.

Have I asked for this? Yes I have. I can (and do) block the applications (or friends) that are most irritating and if it were really a problem I could always stop using facebook altogether. Freedom of choice and all that.

* By keep in touch I mean share pictures, invite to events, pass the odd comment/remark etc. I know there are other avenues out there that do the same but facebook is the one I've settled with.

Leave a comment...

 
To leave a comment on this posterous, please login by clicking one of the following.
Posterous-login     Connect     twitter